Five Pillars for a Maintenance and Reliability Program
James Kovacevic
How does understanding and using the SMRP Body of Knowledge accelerate your current maintenance and reliability program? To begin with, it is designed to provide a framework and outline of what should be in a good program. It also covers some foundational elements, such as project management, change management, etc. All of which are required to start and sustain the program.
The Body of Knowledge, however, does not tell you how to implement a maintenance and reliability program. Why does it not provide the how to? Well, every maintenance & reliability program has the same elements, but they are all very different. The programs must be designed and implemented in a way that fits with the business and is specific to the business goals. These goals will vary across industries and even within industries.
The SMRP Body of Knowledge contains five distinct pillars:
1. Business and management – Describes the skills used to translate an organization’s business goals into appropriate maintenance and reliability goals that support and contribute to the organization’s business results.
2. Manufacturing process reliability – Relates maintenance and reliability activities to the manufacturing process of the organization to ensure that maintenance and reliability activities improve the manufacturing process
3. Equipment reliability – Describes the two kinds of activities that apply to the equipment and processes for which the maintenance and reliability professional is accountable. First, those activities used to assess the current capabilities of the equipment and processes in term of their reliability, availability, maintainability, and criticality. Second are the activities used to select and apply the most appropriate maintenance practices, so that the equipment and processes continue to deliver their intended capabilities in the safest and most cost-effective manner.
4. Organization and leadership – Describes processes for assuring that the maintenance and reliability staff is the most qualified and best assigned to achieve the maintenance and reliability organizational goals.
5. Work management – Focuses on the skills used to get the maintenance and reliability work done. It includes scheduling and planning activities, quality assurance of maintenance activities, stores, and inventory management.
Applying the SMRP Body of Knowledge
In order to apply the Body of Knowledge, one must use all aspects or risk the program failing. This is because Pillar 1 is about building the business case and aligning the maintenance and reliability program with the business goals. Pillar 4 is required to make sure the right resources are in place with the right training, along with managing the significant change that will be implemented in the organization.
Pillar 3 is used to select and build the right maintenance strategy and activities, in order to maintain the level of reliability designed into the equipment. The robust design is a product of other activities in Pillar 3. Pillar 2 is used to minimize the variation in the process, and ensure the product meets the quality specifications. Lastly, Pillar 5 is about ensuring the maintenance activities are carried out as planned, and the right spares are available to ensure the level of work.
Which pillars are used in which order will depend on the current state of your organization. If you have a maintenance program but are unable to execute it, you may need to focus on Pillar 5 first, while using the change management portion of pillar 4. Regardless of the approach, the pillars will provide an outline to lead your program to success.
Compliment the Body of Knowledge
When building a maintenance and reliability program, the current state must be measured, and actions are taken to improve it. This is where metrics come into play. One word of caution: do not try to measure all of the metrics available. Select a few important key performance indicators (KPIs) and start measuring those.
It is okay to change which metrics are used depending on the focus of the organization. Start small and change the metrics as needed, as we don’t need the performance management portion to become its own reporting department.
James Kovacevic, principal instructor at Eruditio, a CFE Media content partner. This article originally appeared on Eruditio’s blog.
Related Articles
If you work in any aspect of manufacturing today, there is no doubt you are aware of a significant revolution underway. It is a new era for the industry, dramatically evident when you take a look around any reasonably maintained and updated manufacturing facility. What is driving this revolution, albeit a slow industry shift from a machinery-based environment to an information-based one? Quite simply, it’s technology and the big data that results from it.
If you work in any aspect of manufacturing today, there is no doubt you are aware of a significant revolution underway. It is a new era for the industry, dramatically evident when you take a look around any reasonably maintained and updated manufacturing facility. What is driving this revolution, albeit a slow industry shift from a machinery-based environment to an information-based one? Quite simply, it’s technology and the big data that results from it.
See More
Work order prioritisation using the CMMS is the next logical step that follows an agreed approach to asset criticality.
Work order prioritisation using the CMMS is the next logical step that follows an agreed approach to asset criticality.
See More
The cost of maintaining the status quo is enormous. The status quo affects each and every one of us every hour of every day, at work and at home. We have come to accept doing nothing as a safe and acceptable alternative. We even make it the default solution. Doing nothing is the management equivalent of a baby’s soother. It makes us feel safe and comfortable. But there is a cost to doing nothing.
The cost of maintaining the status quo is enormous. The status quo affects each and every one of us every hour of every day, at work and at home. We have come to accept doing nothing as a safe and acceptable alternative. We even make it the default solution. Doing nothing is the management equivalent of a baby’s soother. It makes us feel safe and comfortable. But there is a cost to doing nothing.
See More
In the world of production, the heartbeat of success lies in the delicate balance between keeping equipment running (continuous operation) and diving into the intricacies of troubleshooting for root causes. This dichotomy is the confluence of two distinct yet complementary approaches, each pivotal in its own right for maintaining efficiency and sustaining operations within industrial settings.
In the world of production, the heartbeat of success lies in the delicate balance between keeping equipment running (continuous operation) and diving into the intricacies of troubleshooting for root causes. This dichotomy is the confluence of two distinct yet complementary approaches, each pivotal in its own right for maintaining efficiency and sustaining operations within industrial settings.
See More
This article will discuss the difference between industrial coaching and mentoring and how these techniques can be deployed to grow our people, so they engage with processes and thus improve business performance.
This article will discuss the difference between industrial coaching and mentoring and how these techniques can be deployed to grow our people, so they engage with processes and thus improve business performance.
See More
Reliability is not rocket science. It should be easy to achieve. Do things right the first time, from design, procurement, construction, installation, maintenance and operation, all the way through to decommissioning. Isn't this the goal of engineers? Still, in many cases we —industry in general—seem to struggle in achieving high reliability. One reason may be widespread inattention to Mechanical Quality Assurance (MQA).
Reliability is not rocket science. It should be easy to achieve. Do things right the first time, from design, procurement, construction, installation, maintenance and operation, all the way through to decommissioning. Isn't this the goal of engineers? Still, in many cases we —industry in general—seem to struggle in achieving high reliability. One reason may be widespread inattention to Mechanical Quality Assurance (MQA).
See More
"At the end of every batch, my pump wants to go home!" These were the words said to me in halting English by a maintenance manager of a major brewery in Manilla during one of my trips to the beautiful Philippines. Although I was accompanied by a translator, the manager insisted on trying out his limited English. As we were obviously having some kind of communication breakdown, I asked the translator to verify the comment. Sure enough, back it came, accompanied by a big grin and lots of head nodding. "At the end of every batch, my pump wants to go home." Obviously, this was a pump I just had to see!
"At the end of every batch, my pump wants to go home!" These were the words said to me in halting English by a maintenance manager of a major brewery in Manilla during one of my trips to the beautiful Philippines. Although I was accompanied by a translator, the manager insisted on trying out his limited English. As we were obviously having some kind of communication breakdown, I asked the translator to verify the comment. Sure enough, back it came, accompanied by a big grin and lots of head nodding. "At the end of every batch, my pump wants to go home." Obviously, this was a pump I just had to see!
See More
