The Cost of Producing Electricity:
Calculation of Steam Cycle Energy Balance Using a Backpressure
Steam Turbine
Turbosteam
Using a backpressure (or pressure reducing) turbine in a cogeneration
application is the most efficient form of electricity generation ever
invented. This efficiency derives from the fact that the process steam
is "used twice"; first to generate power, and second to satisfy process
loads. Fuel-to-electric efficiencies typically range from 75 - 90%,
whereas U.S. electric grid achieves just 33%. This efficiency difference
leads to substantial savings for cogenerators, who can produce electricity
at 1.5 to 2.0 cents per kWhr, compared to utility rates of 4 to 10 cents
per kWhr. It also means that a backpressure cogenerator can produce
electricity with 1/3 of the fuel required by the grid -- which means
lower emissions of every pollutant including CO2.
The cost per kWhr, the "cost of producing electricity", is the cost
of the energy which is taken out of the steam by the turbine generator
system and converted into electricity. The following paper discusses
calculation methods for determining this cost -- a critical step in
the process of evaluating cogeneration feasibility.
Calculating the Cost of Producing Electricity
- Simple Method:1
The simplest method of calculating the cost of producing
electricity with a backpressure turbine is as follows:
All that must be known is the cost of steam (or cost
of fuel divided by boiler efficiency) in $/Million BTU
steam, and generator efficiency, typically 95%. If a
speed-reduction gear is required, its losses will be
about 1.5%, but for this example, we will assume that
a gear is not required. Assuming a generator efficiency
of 95%, just divide your steam cost by 278:
This will yield a figure that is accurate regardless
of turbine type or turbine efficiency. This method and
the more complex method described below both yield the
same results via different routes.
Keep in mind that the above equation is true regardless
of the specific turbine being used so long as there is
a need for the heat present in the turbine exhaust. Every
kWh produced with a particular facility's turbine will
cost the same, and that cost is dependent only upon the
facility's steam cost. The cost of power does not depend
on turbine efficiency, but the amount of power does.
A less efficient turbine will take fewer BTU's from the
steam, and make fewer kWh; a more efficient turbine will
take more BTU's from the steam and make more kWh. The
total savings over a given period is the element that
will differ.
Actual turbine efficiency or steam rate (also known
as water rate) can be obtained from Turbosteam, or by
using a steam flowmeter and kW meter for an existing
installation.
Calculating the Cost of Producing Electricity
by the Energy Balance Method:
The following discussion covers the calculation of
an energy balance across a process steam cycle. The steam
cycle includes a boiler, pressure reducing station, and
process equipment. We will consider the impact of a steam
turbine generator installation designed to replace an
existing pressure reduction valve. In this example, we
will assume that a turbine selection has been made at
a certain flow and at certain inlet and outlet conditions,
and power output and steam rate have been determined.
However, one can apply this same math to any specific
installation.
- Energy Balance Across the Turbine Generator
System
In reducing steam pressure, the turbine will
extract some of the energy from the steam and convert
it into torque (the generator subsequently converts
this torque into electrical energy). In order to
calculate how much energy the turbine extracts,
it is necessary to find the enthalpy of the turbine
exhaust steam. First establish inlet enthalpy h1 (see
Figure 1) by using the inlet steam temperature
and pressure to find the enthalpy either in the
steam tables or on the Mollier chart.
In the case being examined, the proposed steam
turbine generator system will operate between 280
psig, (dry and saturated steam), and 35 psig exhaust
pressure. Process steam flow is 26,000 PPH (pounds
of steam per hour). In a steam table reference,
we find that the turbine inlet steam at 280 psig,
dry and saturated, has enthalpy of:
Then find hi s e n, the isentropic
exhaust enthalpy (see Figure 1). Since in an isentropic
process, inlet entropy is the same as exhaust entropy,
the latter can be found by starting from h1 on
the Mollier chart, and going vertically down the
chart to the exhaust pressure. Read across to hi
s e n, which in this case is 1066 BTU/lb.
However, real turbines never achieve the theoretical
limit imposed by hi s e n. The actual
enthalpy removed by the turbine (h1-h2 in
figure 1), divided by the theoretical maximum (h1-
hi s e n) is referred to as the mechanical,
or isentropic efficiency of the turbine. This efficiency
is specific to a particular turbine under a particular
set of conditions. In the conditions specified
in this example, the turbine efficiency is 51%.
Thus we can determine h2 as:
Substituting our known values and rearranging
to solve for h2:

or:
Since we know the exhaust pressure to be 35 psig,
we can now refer back to our steam tables to determine
that the exhaust steam will be of the following
condition:
| Specific Enthalpy (h2 ) |
1133 BTU/lb |
| Pressure (P2 ) |
35 psig |
| Temperature (T2 ) |
281oF |
| Quality |
96% (4% moisture) |
Furthermore, we can now calculate the power production
from the turbine generator – which is equivalent
to the enthalpy removed from the steam, less friction
and resistance losses in the generator:
-
In the next section, we will consider how this
impacts your process.
- Energy Balance Across
the Process Steam Cycle
Heat required by your
process (Qprocess)
is calculated based on
the known condition (temperature
and pressure) of the condensate
which is returned to your
boiler.2 Here 180 BTU/lb
is assumed to be the enthalpy
remaining in the condensate
after your process heating
loads have been satisfied
(h3). Then:
where m is pounds
per hour of steam. Solving
first for Qprocess:

or:
After the turbine-generator
installation, the process
will still require the
same amount of heat flux.
However, as we have already
shown, the enthalpy h2 at
the turbine exhaust is
lower than the enthalpy
that would have otherwise
been retained in a PRV
(h1).
Since we still need to
provide Qprocess heat,
we therefore must slightly
increase our steam production
to mnew, such
that:
Solving for mnew:
Thus, we must slightly
increase our steam production
(in this case, by 7.3%)
to satisfy process thermal
needs.3 However,
we will also slightly increase
the power output of the
turbine due to rising mass
flows -- in this case,
to 544 kW.
The cost of making electricity
is thus the cost of producing
this additional 1,909 lbs/hr
(a function solely of boiler
efficiencies) divided by
the turbine-generator electricity
production (544 kW).
These calculations are
shown schematically in
the following two figures.
We now know that the
turbine generator will
generate 544 kW of electricity,
and that to do so, we will
require an increased steam
flow of 1,909 lbs/hr to
the process. The cost of
electricity is thus the
cost of this additional
steam, divided by the power
of output. Assuming a steam
cost of $4 per thousand
pounds:
At average U.S. electricity
rates of 6.6 cents/kWh,
this system will thus save
5.2 cents per kWh, or:
over a 7,000 hour operating
year.
1Throughout this paper, we
have used the most conservative possible estimates of
turbine-generator efficiency. Most installations achieve
even higher efficiencies, because the simplifying assumptions
used in this generic set of thermodynamic calculations
often differ from the practical considerations present
in an operating steam plant. For a discussion of how
these operating considerations may impact the economics
of a particular facility, see part II of this paper: “Approaching
Free Electricity: How the real world differs from thermodynamic
models”.
2Note that this math assumes that 100%
of your condensate is returned to your boiler. In
real steam plants, actual condensate return is often
less than 100% -- and in many cases, this can serve
to increase the effective power generation efficiency
of a backpressure turbine generator. For details
on how this might apply to a particular installation,
see part II of this paper: “Approaching Free Electricity:
How the real world differs from thermodynamic models”.
3Note that we are implicitly (and conservatively)
assuming that the condensate return condition is
fixed due to process temperature requirements. In
many cases, processes will actually tolerate lower
condensate temperatures, in which case the BTUs removed
in the turbine generator would be replaced not by
higher mass flows but rather by increased heat additions
in the boiler, which is now heating colder condensate.
The net economic impact is the same, but the actual
operational impacts may differ.
|