| Maintaining Process Control Field Devices Maintenance
Technology
Posted
5-10-04 By Thomas Wallace, Asset Management Solutions, Fisher-Rosemount
Systems, Inc.
Adding microprocessors to field instruments has transformed
them into data acquisition systems and transmission terminals.
Now technicians can use well-designed software to see what
is happening inside plant instrumentation.
Instrumentation technicians responsible for reliable operation
of thousands of field devices commonly receive calls from operators
who are having trouble controlling a piece of production equipment,
a reactor for example. If the plant is equipped with state-of-the-art
asset management software, the technician can quickly determine
which devices are associated with that reactor and which ones
could be causing problems. When asset management software is
used, devices that need service can signal the operator or
maintenance shop before they fail, lowering maintenance or
repair costs and reducing the risk of unscheduled shutdown.
Rather than going into the plant, the technician can evaluate
each smart device from a personal computer in the instrument
shop. For example, a quick computer check of the condition
of each field device serving that reactor might reveal a travel
deviation alert from one control valve, indicating a significant
difference between the valve set point and its actual position--a
situation requiring attention. The technician is spared long
hours of checking out individual devices on the plant floor
and knows exactly what must be done to correct the problem.
Although the poorly functioning valve in the reactor is hypothetical,
the solution to this common problem is not. Up to 60 percent
of instrument maintenance labor dollars are spent on devices
where no problem exists or for routine checks to verify the
condition of properly functioning devices. These requests
often occur because an operator has no means of checking
on the health and validity of field instrumentation and therefore
calls the instrument shop when a problem is suspected. The
most time-consuming and expensive service calls are those
that conclude with no problem found.
Now, instrumentation technicians have a way to see what is
happening inside plant instrumentation by using well-designed
software in conjunction with intelligent field devices and
new standard communications. These technologies allow technicians
to
- Make sure field devices deliver optimum performance
- Use predictive maintenance to maximize service and repair
resources
- Perform configurations and calibrations in half the normal
time
- Document maintenance as required by industry regulators.
From a broader perspective, the integration and use of information
acquired from intelligent field devices eliminates unexpected
shutdowns, reduces downtime, and improves overall equipment
performance.
Intelligent field devices
The process control system is designed for tight control of
valves, motors, heaters, etc., in real time to manage feed
stocks and make quality products. However, to increase the
reliability and maintainability of plant instrumentation
and process equipment and to lower the mean time between
failures and time to accomplish repairs, a vast amount of
information is needed about the condition and status of field
equipment. The increase in smart instruments throughout the
process industry makes it both practical and economical to
use all the information they generate. It is estimated that
30 times more information is available from smart instruments
than the simple variables required for process control.
Consider a smart pressure transmitter. Beyond providing basic
pressure data, it can produce information relative to an overpressure
condition (which can lead to inaccurate readings), an overtemperature
condition (which can cause premature failure), a loss of signal,
a stuck signal, and more. In the case of a control valve, the
number of times the valve has cycled is a key indicator of
how much work it has done and can be used in predicting its
useful life. As the reactor example mentioned previously suggests,
the internal position of a valve stem versus where it is supposed
to be is critically important to the reliable operation of
that piece of equipment. Smart valves routinely provide this
kind of information.
The accuracy of field measurements and the reliability of
field instrumentation are influenced by internal conditions
that can be reported only by intelligent devices, and those
conditions can have a direct impact on the availability or
reliability of the process itself. Demand to make use of such
data is growing. The acquired information must be made available
well beyond the process control system.
Communicating the data
Automation architectures are evolving to deliver information
from intelligent field devices, acting as information servers,
around the control system to computers where the information
can be used for diagnostic and maintenance purposes, for
reliability analysis, for purchasing and inventory control
systems, and for the overall management of plant assets.
General-purpose field communications protocols capable of
transmitting large volumes of information for these purposes
are currently in use. Today, the Highway Addressable Remote
Transducer (HART) protocol offers the broadest range of user
benefits and is supported by a wide range of vendors. Unlike
proprietary communications technologies that lock users into
field devices from a single manufacturer, the HART protocol
is an open communications standard that works alongside any
control system without interrupting the flow of process data.
Whereas HART transmits both analog and digital signals, the
emerging Foundation Fieldbus protocol will be used with all-digital
systems. Profibus is another new protocol under development.
These sophisticated protocols are capable of carrying complex
messages. Their use enables technicians to examine an instrument's
self-diagnostics and also run extensive diagnostics programs
on each device.
Using the information
For field data to be turned into useful knowledge, a reliable
method of receiving, processing, and presenting it is required.
Maintenance personnel require information on the condition
of equipment, while operations personnel want other information
and purchasing or inventory control requires something different.
Each group needs information tailored to specific requirements.
For example, the enhancement most desired by maintenance
supervisors is seamless access to maintenance-related data.
Advanced software applications are performing that function
now.
Monitoring the intelligent devices installed in a plant and
viewing their self-diagnostics probably are the most common
functions of the instrumentation technician. Most smart instruments
provide extensive information about their own health. Access
to on-line device status provides a way to monitor and ensure
proper device performance. The technician calls up the information
device by device to see if any faults are flagged.
Automatic alert monitoring also is available to automatically
scan devices on a user-determined schedule. If device problems
exist, the information is posted to an alert monitor list.
If no specific problems are found but something is suspected,
it may be possible, depending on the software package, to use
on-demand diagnostics. Certain operating parameters may be
changed slightly to see if the device responds. For example,
safety valves might be moved slightly to determine that the
valve is not stuck and actuator pressures are sufficient to
move the valve.
Automatic scanning of devices requires a higher level of sophistication.
Such scans may uncover devices that need immediate attention,
or they might generate lists of devices due for calibration.
Some software is designed to interface with computerized maintenance
management systems that track maintenance schedules and alert
technicians when maintenance is due. Sophisticated software
that identifies a need for instrument calibration combined
with intelligent calibrators may also be able to automatically
perform configurations and calibrations in a fraction of the
time required for conventional calibrations.
Advanced, maintenance-oriented software permits maximum use
of the information transmitted through a general-purpose protocol.
The more advanced software receives the data, organizes it
into open databases, and makes it available to other applications
within the organization. Predictive maintenance is one of the
key attributes of such systems. When the software makes a prediction
about the expected service life of any piece of equipment,
knowledgeable decisions can be made as to when repair or replacement
will cause the least disruption to production.
Decisions such as run until failure, continue to run at reduced
load, run until a scheduled shutdown, or repair immediately
are based on highly reliable information, including the importance
of the piece of equipment to the process. This approach helps
focus limited resources on problems that warrant attention
rather than wasting time on devices expected to continue working
properly. In this way, instruments and control systems can
be maintained in a high state of continued reliability.
What to look for
It is not difficult to obtain a communications and software
package capable of accessing information generated by smart
instruments, but not all software is created equal. First,
potential buyers should be sure that nothing done with this
ancillary information degrades the performance of the control
system. Users of heavily loaded control systems may want
to reserve all remaining control system capacity for future
process control needs. Solutions available from various vendors
of HART-compatible devices will carry the information through
multiplexing, through intrinsic safety barrier panels, and
through intelligent termination panels where information
can be accessed by computers without using control system
communications and computation resources.
However, data acquisition by itself does not provide the cost
and time-saving benefits most maintenance managers are seeking.
A flexible, maintenance-oriented, modular software platform
that is both expandable and scalable must be found. Such software
can provide access to a single device or to highly integrated
client/server solutions for large multi-instrument plants.
In addition, the software should use device descriptions (DD),
which are essentially files of field device attributes residing
in the host application. The DD is essential to the interoperability
of devices, allowing users to choose those that best meet their
needs, regardless of manufacturer. As each new device is introduced,
the description of attributes and capabilities is loaded into
the host, providing complete data about each device in the
plant. The DD technology is fundamental to the HART and Fieldbus
protocols.
To be most useful, the software must accommodate the broadest
range of field devices. It should support virtually all current
HART and future Fieldbus devices, not just those manufactured
by one company. In other words, the company should choose a
technology to accommodate the widest range of applications
needed to meet current and future plant and business needs.
A number of good solutions are available. However, many tend
to focus on a specific vendor's field instrumentation, which
does not generally solve the problem of the large multi-instrument
user.
Finally, it must be possible to integrate data from the field
management software with any computerized maintenance management
system the plant is running. An integrated solution is essential
to realize the greatest value from information derived from
intelligent field devices, transported through a state-of-the-art
data highway, and processed in sophisticated, maintenance-oriented
software.
Estimates show that one-third of all dollars spent on maintenance
are wasted because of unnecessary work or ineffective practices.
This trend can be reversed through the application of information
generated by intelligent field devices and acceptance of the
concept of predictive maintenance. The result can be a significant
contribution to a plant's profitability.
It is not necessary to totally restructure maintenance practices.
A plant can start small and expand the use of process floor
information as needs dictate and budgets allow. The key is
to begin building a database from the smart devices now in
operation and expand the use of the available information as
the number of such devices grows. A scalable and expandable
platform can grow into a plantwide system that supports the
reliability and maintainability of all field instrumentation.
|